![\"\"](\"https:\/\/portale2.unime.it\/cisu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/55\/2026\/03\/rivista-XXI.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Messina, Centro Internazionale di Studi Umanistici, 2023, 362 pp.; 25 cm. \u20ac<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n SOMMARIO TESSERE Indice delle tavole <\/p>\n ABSTRACT<\/p>\n M. BERT\u00c9, Il trittico del pianto nell\u2019\u2018archetipo a donato\u2019: Disperse 55-57<\/em> A. PIACENTINI, La Dispersa 13 di Petrarca a Francesco Nelli<\/em> S. BRUSA, \u00abValete, immerite exul et egregie\u00bb: Petrarca a Iohannolus Mondellus (Dispersa 69)<\/em> A. GIULIANO, Per la storia umanistica del Laur. 49, 9. Cencio de\u2019 Rustici e i<\/em> graeca delle<\/em> Familiares di Cicerone<\/em> S. PAGLIAROLI, Marc-Antoine Muret, Luciano di S sata e Fran\u00e7ois Rabelais<\/em> M. MARONESE, Per i carmi greci di Gianfrancesco Mussato<\/em> S. PAGLIAROLI, Un manoscritto dimenticato con il commento di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino al<\/em> \u03a0\u03b5\u03c1\u1f76 \u1f11\u03c1\u03bc\u03b7\u03bd\u03b5\u03af\u03b1\u03c2 di Aristotele e la <\/em>Poetria nova di Geoffroi de Vinsauf (Verona, Biblioteca Capitolare, CCCIX)<\/em> A. ANTONAZZO, Sul titolo della biografia boccacciana di Petrarca A. ONORATO, Per Giovanni da San Miniato e Salutati: un nuovo codice<\/em> S. PAGLIAROLI, La<\/em> comparatio di Lorenzo Valla tra le orazioni di Cicerone e le declamazioni di Quintiliano in una lettera di Maffeo Vallaresso<\/em> S. MARTINELLI TEMPESTA, Un nuovo tassello per la biblioteca greca di Francesco Filelfo. L\u2019Appiano di Wroc\u0142aw, Rehd. 14<\/em> L. ORLANDI, Di Giorgio Zebedeo copista e possessore di codici greci<\/em> G. PETTE, La prima sottoscrizione a Catullo del Poliziano<\/em> D. GIONTA, Per Matteo Bosso e l\u2019epigrafia: le iscrizioni del chiostro di San Leonardo in Monte Donico<\/em>
\nXXI (2023)<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nISSN 2035-3774<\/p>\n
\nMonica Bert\u00e9, Il trittico del pianto nell\u2019\u2018archetipo a donato\u2019: Disperse 55-57<\/em>
\nAngelo Piacentini, La Dispersa 13 di Petrarca a Francesco Nelli<\/em>
\nSofia Brusa, \u00abValete, immerite exul et egregie\u00bb: Petrarca a Iohannolus Mondellus (Dispersa 69)<\/em>
\nAlessandra Giuliano, Per la storia umanistica del Laur. 49, 9. Cencio de\u2019 Rustici e i<\/em> graeca delle<\/em> Familiares di Cicerone<\/em>
\nStefano Pagliaroli, Marc-Antoine Muret, Luciano di S sata e Fran\u00e7ois Rabelais<\/em>
\nManoel Maronese, Per i carmi greci di Gianfrancesco Mussato<\/em><\/p>\n
\nS. Pagliaroli, Un manoscritto dimenticato con il commento di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino al <\/em>\u03a0\u03b5\u03c1\u1f76 \u1f11\u03c1\u03bc\u03b7\u03bd\u03b5\u03af\u03b1\u03c2 di Aristotele e la Poetria nova di Geoffroi de Vinsauf (Verona, Bibl. Capitolare, CCCIX)<\/em>
\nA. Antonazzo, Sul titolo della biografia boccacciana di Petrarca<\/em>
\nA. Onorato, Per Giovanni da San Miniato e Salutati: un nuovo codice<\/em>
\nS. Pagliaroli, La <\/em>comparatio di Lorenzo Valla tra Cicerone e Quintiliano in una lettera di Maffeo Vallaresso<\/em>
\nS. Martinelli Tempesta, Un nuovo tassello per la biblioteca greca di Francesco Filelfo. L\u2019Appiano di Wroc\u0142aw, Rehd. 14<\/em>
\nL. Orlandi, Di Giorgio Zebedeo copista e possessore di codici greci<\/em>
\nG. Pette, La prima sottoscrizione a Catullo del Poliziano<\/em>
\nD. Gionta, Per Matteo Bosso e l\u2019epigrafia: le iscrizioni del chiostro di San Leonardo in Monte Donico<\/em>
\nD. Gionta, Ancora sulla copia di dedica della silloge epigrafica di Giocondo per Lorenzo de\u2019 Medici (Vat. lat. 10228)<\/em><\/p>\n
\nIndice dei manoscritti e delle fonti d\u2019archivio
\nIndice dei nomi<\/p>\n
\nThe essay includes a critical edition, translation, and commentary on three of Petrarch\u2019s letters, Disperse 55\u201357, and provides a thorough introduction that analyzes the content, discusses the dating of this trio, and examines the characteristics and the hands of the idiograph Marc. lat. XIII 70, which contains them.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThe article includes the critical text, translation, and commentary for the Dispersa 13 (= Var. 39) by Petrarch, a letter addressed to Francesco Nelli, written from Padua and dated April 6, 1351. This brief epistle, composed in a friendly and intimate tone, was entrusted to Giovanni Boccaccio, then in Padua as an ambassador for the city of Florence, for delivery to the addressee. The text has been reconstructed from five manuscripts, which preserve a small collection of Petrarch\u2019s writings, named by Vittorio Rossi \u2018Raccolta fiorentina\u2019. Furthermore, certain ope ingenii interventions suggested by Giuseppe Fracassetti and Henry Cochin, though accepted by later editors, were deemed unnecessary. Several classical intertextual elements have been identified, along with clarifications regarding the libellus, a breviary that Nelli had gifted to Petrarch.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThe article offers a new edition of Petrarch\u2019s Dispersa 69, written in 1368 to a Milanese friend, <\/em>Iohannolus Mondellus. The edition, accompanied by an Italian translation and a rich commentary, is based on all three known witnesses to the letter, one of which is presented here for the first time, and allows for improvements to the text in several instances. Moreover, contextual issues such as the dating of Petrarch\u2019s journey to Lombardy mentioned in the letter and, above all, the identity of his correspondent are addressed. The previously accepted identification with Giovanni Mandelli, the dedicatee of Petrarch\u2019s <\/em>Itinerarium, is rejected based on archival evidence. Other possible identifications are tentatively suggested, but the question remains open.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThe 15th-century history of the distinguished Carolingian codex of Cicero\u2019s Epistulae ad familiares Laur. 49, 9 (also known as M) has remained partially obscure. This study proposes identifying the hand responsible for restoring and interpreting several graeca in M as that of Cencio de\u2019 Rustici. Cencio\u2019s intervention appears entirely independent from the more renowned restoration undertaken by Manuel Chrysoloras on Laur. 49, 7 (P), which became widely influential in humanist manuscripts and early printed editions. Furthermore, the analysis of a second manuscript copied by Cencio, ms. Berol. lat. fol. 609 (B), reveals that his engagement with M yielded further outcomes. The identification of Cencio\u2019s hand in M challenges the communis opinio that M led a wholly isolated existence during the Renaissance and played no role in the humanistic transmission of Cicero\u2019s correspondence.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThe article focuses on two 16th-century greek editions of Lucian of Samosata\u2019s works (published in Venice by the heirs of Aldus Manutius in 1522), which are held in the Vatican Library. It recognizes in their margins the conspicuous presence of autograph annotations by Marc-Antoine Muret. The history of the two Vatican volumes is outlined within a context that also reconstructs the interests in Lucian, so far little known, of the french humanist. A significant selection of Muret\u2019s annotations is then presented, one of which mentions the contemporary Fran\u00e7ois Rabelais and his interpretation of a passage by Lucian in the prologue to the Tiers livre.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThis article presents the critical edition of five Greek poems, preserved in the collection of the Library of the Episcopal Seminary of Padua, by the scholar and humanist Gianfrancesco Mussato from Padua (active in the second half of the 16th-century). The edition includes a critical apparatus, the first Italian translation of the texts, and notes providing both linguistic and content-focused commentary.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThe article investigates the little-known manuscript CCCIX of the veronese Biblioteca Capitolare, containing the <\/em>Poetria nova by Geoffroi de Vinsauf, at the beginning of which some independent sheets exhibit portions (previously completely ignored) of the commentary by Thomas Aquinas on Aristotle\u2019s <\/em>\u03a0\u03b5\u03c1\u1f76 \u1f11\u03c1\u03bc\u03b7\u03bd\u03b5\u03af\u03b1\u03c2. A quick outline of the history of the volume suggests an emilian-romagnol trail for its provenance and reveals, on the basis of an annotation written on the front cover, the identity of a veronese owner from the beginning of the fifteenth century. A specific excursus documents the presence, not negligible and to be further explored, of both the vinsaufian poem and the aristotelian opuscule in the three redactions of Pietro Alighieri\u2019s Comentum.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThis article offers a critical examination of the title of Francesco Petrarca\u2019s biography composed by Giovanni Boccaccio, <\/em>De vita et moribus domini Francisci Petracchi de Florentia secundum Iohannem Bochacii de Certaldo. On the basis of a direct analysis of the sole extant manuscript preserving the text (Marc. Lat. XIV 223), and through a reassessment of the scholarly tradition, a slight revision of the vulgate version is proposed.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThe British Library ms. Harl. 5255 transmits a text of the epistle of Giovanni da San Miniato to Angelo Corbinelli and of the well known responsiva of Salutati (already edited respectively by Ullman and Novati) with numerous and conspicuous variants, responsible for a rather problematic textual facies. The article proposes a typological examination of the variae lectiones (without neglecting, also, the relationship of the new codex with the other representatives of the tradition) in an attempt to shed light on the genetic dynamics, paternity, and editorial value of the peculiar Harleian testimony.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nIn the voluminous correspondence Barb. lat. 1809 of the venetian prelate Maffeo Vallaresso, the article draws attention to some references to Lorenzo Valla. The most important reveals the existence, and notoriety at the beginning of the 1450s, of a writing by Valla entirely devoted to Cicero\u2019s orations and Quintilian\u2019s (as he thought the author) declamations; and confirms how far the humanist, after the youthful Quintiliani Tulliique examen, had kept his promise to publish a more extensive comparatio between the oratory-declamatory works of the two ancient writers. Another hint allows us to better characterize the rather evanescent identity of Girolamo Cinna, a pupil of Valla.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThe identification of Francesco Filelfo\u2019s hand on the margins of the manuscript now in Wroc\u0142aw, Rehd. 14, allows the A. to shed light upon some details of the history of the manuscript and the events surrounding the Latin translation of Appian\u2019s historical work between Pier Candido Decembrio and Francesco Filelfo.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThis paper brings together the first set of manuscript evidence pertaining to a hitherto little-known figure. We are concerned with Georgios Zebedaios, a member of the \u2018network\u2019 of Michael Apostoles operating in Crete around the mid-15th century. This article presents the features peculiar to Zebedaios\u2019 Greek script and attempts to reconstruct his profile as a scholar.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThis essay examines the subscription written by the young Poliziano in a printed volume containing works by Catullus and other Latin poets (Venice, Vindelinus de Spira, 1472; now 50.F.37 of the Corsinian Library in Rome). Due to the fading of the ink over time and the excessive trimming of the margins by a bookbinder, this subscription presents certain challenges. Therefore, the A. proposes a new reading of it.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nA very little-known Rimini manuscript containing an epigraphic collection preserves the captions composed by the humanist Matteo Bosso for the lost frescoes of the cloister of San Leonardo in Monte Donico (Verona). A careful examination reveals this manuscript as an important witness to the tradition of these forgotten texts and to the history of the pictorial cycle itself.<\/em><\/p>\n