Abbiamo chiesto alle nostre relatrici e ai nostri relatori di indicarci alcuni testi utili di approfondimento dei temi trattati: 

– Anderson, M.J. 2005, “Negotiating Sex”, Southern California Law Review, 41, 101-40.

– Bianchi, C. (2022) “Dangerous Liaisons: The Pragmatics of Sexual Negotiation”, Argumenta, 8, 1, pp. 137-151, 10.14275/2465-2334/202215.bia.

– Caponetto, L. forth., “The Pragmatic Structure of Refusal”, Synthese.

– Kukla, R. 2018, “That’s What She Said: The Language of Sexual Negotiation”, Ethics, 129, 1, 70-97.

– Langton, R. 1993, “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22, 4, 292-330.

– Hearn, J. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist theory, 5(1), 49-72.
– Berry, K. (2003). The symbolic use of Afghan women in the war on terror. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 137-160.
– von der Lippe, B. (2006). Images of Victory Images of Masculinity? Images of Victory Images of Masculinity?. Nordicom Review, 27(1), 63-79
– Hakim, C. (2010). Erotic capital. European sociological review, 26(5), 499-518
– Young, I. M. (2002). Lived body vs gender: Reflections on social structure and subjectivity. Ratio, 15(4), 410-428.
– Jenkins, R. (2000). Disenchantment, enchantment and re-enchantment: Max Weber at the millennium. Max Weber Studies, 11-32.
– Horst, C., & Lysaker, O. (2019). Miracles in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt and Refugees as ‘Vanguard’. Journal of Refugee Studies.
– Fernández-Álvarez, Ó. (2014). Non-hegemonic masculinity against gender violence. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 161, 48-55.
– Berry, K. (2003). The symbolic use of Afghan women in the war on terror. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 137-160.
– Priulla, G. (2016). La libertà difficile delle donne: ragionando di corpi e di poteri. La libertà difficile delle donne, 1-388.
– Bourdieu, P. (1998) Il dominio maschile, Feltrinelli
– Priulla G. (2019) Violate. Sessismo e cultura dello stupro, Villaggio Maori
– Arruzza C., Bhattacharya T., Fraser N., Femminismo per il 99%. Un manifesto, Laterza, 2019
– Butler J., Questione di genere. Il femminismo e la sovversione dell’identità, (Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, 1990), Laterza, 2013
-Davis A., Donne, razza e classe (Women, race and class, 1981) Alegre, 2018
-de Beauvoir S., Il secondo sesso (Le Deuxième Sexe, 1949), il Saggiatore, 2008
-de Lauretis T., Soggetti eccentrici, Feltrinelli, 1999
– Libreria delle donne di Milano, Non credere di avere dei diritti, Rosenberg & Sellier 1987
-Lonzi, C. La donna clitoridea e la donna vaginale, in C. Lonzi, Sputiamo su Hegel. La donna clitoridea e la donna vaginale e altri scritti, 3° ed., Scritti di Rivolta Femminile, Milano, 1974, pp. 77-140.
– Melandri L., Le passioni del corpo. La vicenda dei sessi tra origine e storia, Feltrinelli (2000)
-Melandri L., La sfida del femminismo degli anni ‘70, articolo on line in, 17 dicembre 2020
– Rossi Doria A., Dare forma al silenzio. Scritti di storia politica delle donne, Viella, 2007
-Lim J., Browne K., Geographies of Sexualities Theory, Practices and Politics, Routledge, 2007
-Corbisiero F., MonacoS., Città arcobaleno. Una mappa della vita omosessuale in Italia, Donzelli, 2017
-Castells M., La fine del patriarcato: movimenti sociali, famiglia e sessualità nell’età dell’informazione in “Il potere delle identità” di M. Castells, UBE paperback, 2014
-Bartky Sandra.L. (1990),  Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. London: Routledge.
-Boero Natalie (2020), The Oxford Handbook Of The Sociology Of Body And Embodiment, Oxford University Press, USA.
-Bordo Susan (1993), Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture and the Body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-Bourdieu P. (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge.
-Cersosimo G. (2010), Corpo e medicina: alcune questioni nei sistemi sociali contemporanei.
in La salute tra assetti sociali e organizzazioni sanitarie: sviluppi e prospettive in discussione pp.83-102 Milano Franco Angeli.
-Chapkis Wendy (1986), Beauty Secrets: Women and the Politics of Appearance. London: The Women’s Press.
-Featherstone Mike. (1991), ‘The Body in Consumer Culture’, in M. Featherstone, M. Hepworth and B. Turner (eds) The Body, Social Process and Cultural Theory. London: Sage.
-Foucault M. (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-Frost L. (2001), Young Women and the Body: A Feminist Sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.

– Link Rivista Illuminazioni, num 55, Gennaio-Marzo 2021

– DiMuccio, S. H., & Knowles, E. D. (2020). The political significance of fragile masculinity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences34, 25-28.
Gender Stereotypes, Naomi Ellemers, Annual Review of Psychology 2018 69:1, 275-298
-American Psychological Association. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Retrieved from

-Baldissarri, C., Andrighetto, L., Gabbiadini, A.,Valtorta, R. R., Sacino, A., & Volpato C. (2019). Do self-objectified women believe themselves to be free? Sexual objectification and belief in personal free will. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1867.
-Bernard, P., Gervais, S. J., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S., & Klein, O. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469-471.
-Cogoni, C., Carnaghi, A., & Silani, G. (2015). Can we empathize with objectified women? How the perception of others shapes our feeling toward them. In P. Bernardis, C. Fantoni, & W. Gerbino (Eds.), TSPC2015: Proceedings of the Trieste Symposium on Perception and Cognition, November 13rd 2015 (pp. 43-44). Trieste, Italy: EUT.
-Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.
-Galdi, S. (2014): Dall’oggettivazione della donna in televisione alle molestie sessuali, il passo è breve?. Psicologia Sociale, 3, 271-290. ISSN: 18272517; doi: 10.1482/78350; eid=2-s2.0-85042299866.
-Galdi, S., Maass, A., & Cadinu, M. (2014). Objectifying media their effect on gender role norms and sexual harassment of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly38, 398-413.
-Galdi, S., Maass, A., & Cadinu, M. (2017). Defending the victim of sexual harassment: The influence of civil courage and media exposure. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 338-351.
-Galdi, S., Guizzo, F. (2020). Media-induced sexual harassment: the routes from sexually objectifying media to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 84, 645-669. ISSN: 03600025; doi: 10.1007/s11199-020-01196-0; eid=2-s2.0-85092339514; WOS:000576561200001.
-Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin134, 460-476.
-Guizzo, F., Cadinu, M., Galdi, S., Maass, A., & Latrofa, M. (2017). Objecting to objectification: women’s collective action against sexual objectification on television. Sex Roles77, 352-365.
-Heflick, N. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 572-581.
-Holland, E., & Haslam, N. (2016). Cute little things: The objectification of prepubescent girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly40, 108-119.
-Loughnan, S., Baldissarri, C., Spaccatini, F., & Elder, L. (2017). Internalizing objectification: Objectified individuals see themselves as less warm, competent, moral, and human. British Journal of Social Psychology56, 217-232.
-Loughnan, S., & Pacilli, M. G. (2014). Seeing (and treating) others as sexual objects: Toward a more complete mapping of sexual objectification. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology21, 309-325.

Progetto STEP:
-Reichl, A. J., Ali, J. I., & Uyeda, K. (2018). Latent sexism in print ads increases acceptance of sexual assault. Sage Open8, 1-11.

-Rousseau, A., Rodgers, R. F., & Eggermont, S. (2019). Short-term longitudinal exploration of the impact of TV exposure on objectifying attitudes toward women in early adolescent boys. Sex Roles, 80, 186-199.
-Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology31, 493-517.
-Vaes, J., Cristoforetti, G., Ruzzante, D., Cogoni, C., & Mazza, V. (2019). Assessing neural responses towards objectified human targets and objects to identify processes of sexual objectification that go beyond the metaphor. Scientific Reports9, 6699.
-Vaes, J., Loughnan, S., & Puvia, E. (2014). The inhuman body: When sexual objectification becomes dehumanizing. In P. G. Bain, J. Vaes, & J-Ph. Leyens (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 187-204). New York: Taylor & Francis.
-Ward, L. M. (2016). Media and sexualization: State of empirical research, 1995-2015. The Journal of Sex Research53, 560-577.